<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Between the Lines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com</link>
	<description>Some thoughts on the news, religion and life in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:42:10 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maqasid al-Shari&#8217;ah and fanaticism by Abu Ibraheem</title>
		<link>http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/2010/04/06/maqasid-al-shari%e2%80%99ah-and-fanaticism/comment-page-1/#comment-3427</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Ibraheem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/?p=1131#comment-3427</guid>
		<description>Asalaam alaikum brothers, especially Br. Abdullah Hassan, instead of talking about &#039;you know&#039;..&#039;those people&#039;..and all that, im sure its not relating to the brothers who have always called political participation kufr, shirk and called people names.

However i&#039;ve notice HT have disgussed ideas like shara man qablana, and maqasid, and maslahah etc. But this was only to refute the use or misuse buy some muslims today for and Islamic standpoint. Since we would agree that differences can exist amongst movements, it would only make sense to seek the strongest opinion with our utmost effort and from those people of knowledge. When I say people of knowledge its doesnt necessarily have to be a majority, (like some family fortunes gameshow..&#039;our survey says: mosque scholars say voting is allowed) but rather the validy and strenghth of the argument in its accordance with the shara. So please can you show us possible flaws in the arguments laid out below in these talks to start engaging in some dialogue with these differences, to show us why two camps can have a difference in the first place:

Maslaha: http://www.archive.org/details/Maslaha-IntroductionAndPrinciples

Lesser of the two evils: http://www.archive.org/details/LesserOfTheTwoEvils-ExplanationAndApplication

Just a side point..this thing of &#039;there isnt a debate to be had&#039; is really unhelpful. I dont really care who said it, why would anyone afford the opinions of non Muslims some validity in interfaith, integration, political dialogue whilst undemocratically silencing those with clear evidences from Quran and Sunnah (whether you follow that opinion or not) by saying &#039;theres no debate to be had&#039;. Not very democratic is it? Put your argument accross and let the people decide.

Im more interested in the difference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asalaam alaikum brothers, especially Br. Abdullah Hassan, instead of talking about &#8216;you know&#8217;..&#8217;those people&#8217;..and all that, im sure its not relating to the brothers who have always called political participation kufr, shirk and called people names.</p>
<p>However i&#8217;ve notice HT have disgussed ideas like shara man qablana, and maqasid, and maslahah etc. But this was only to refute the use or misuse buy some muslims today for and Islamic standpoint. Since we would agree that differences can exist amongst movements, it would only make sense to seek the strongest opinion with our utmost effort and from those people of knowledge. When I say people of knowledge its doesnt necessarily have to be a majority, (like some family fortunes gameshow..&#8217;our survey says: mosque scholars say voting is allowed) but rather the validy and strenghth of the argument in its accordance with the shara. So please can you show us possible flaws in the arguments laid out below in these talks to start engaging in some dialogue with these differences, to show us why two camps can have a difference in the first place:</p>
<p>Maslaha: <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/Maslaha-IntroductionAndPrinciples" rel="nofollow">http://www.archive.org/details/Maslaha-IntroductionAndPrinciples</a></p>
<p>Lesser of the two evils: <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/LesserOfTheTwoEvils-ExplanationAndApplication" rel="nofollow">http://www.archive.org/details/LesserOfTheTwoEvils-ExplanationAndApplication</a></p>
<p>Just a side point..this thing of &#8216;there isnt a debate to be had&#8217; is really unhelpful. I dont really care who said it, why would anyone afford the opinions of non Muslims some validity in interfaith, integration, political dialogue whilst undemocratically silencing those with clear evidences from Quran and Sunnah (whether you follow that opinion or not) by saying &#8216;theres no debate to be had&#8217;. Not very democratic is it? Put your argument accross and let the people decide.</p>
<p>Im more interested in the difference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There isn’t a debate to be had by Night Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/2010/03/31/there-isn%e2%80%99t-a-debate-to-be-had/comment-page-1/#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/?p=1118#comment-3426</guid>
		<description>Good piece here, i would just like to say the people of france had the view of not to vote they too thoght it was kufr, now you got the nikab and hijab ban, would the muslims of UK, like to see thier sisters and mothers uncovered, also sex education being tought to your little brs and srs? 

its about time muslims start to get politicly active so they can have a say and influnece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good piece here, i would just like to say the people of france had the view of not to vote they too thoght it was kufr, now you got the nikab and hijab ban, would the muslims of UK, like to see thier sisters and mothers uncovered, also sex education being tought to your little brs and srs? </p>
<p>its about time muslims start to get politicly active so they can have a say and influnece</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There isn’t a debate to be had by Hussain</title>
		<link>http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/2010/03/31/there-isn%e2%80%99t-a-debate-to-be-had/comment-page-1/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator>Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/?p=1118#comment-3423</guid>
		<description>Salams

It seems the title of this article &#039;There isn&#039;t a debate to be had&#039; really has become the modus operendi..lol

Just a few issues for the brothers and sisters who are reading and practicing &#039;There isn&#039;t a debate to be had&#039;... I think there is more to this issue than just the title.

For those who believe taking part in electing a legislature to rule by kufr is not only important but necessary to reduce the harm by choosing the lesser harm(which would be the common sense conclusion since you are saying the importance of the matter takes it from haram to halal/and required). 
Then why are we not told by these scholars and organisations who to vote for PUBLICLY? If it soo important and the great interest of the muslim&#039;s in the UK, why is the message only &#039;get involved and vote&#039;, but not tell us who for?

If you want advise on an issue or a hukm, it is normal to get an answer from the scholars and those who lead the ummah, so why do we get a half answer here?

My analysis is, nobody wants to back a particular party as it may go against the interests of that scholar/group (or their projects/institutions) in the future, as in democracy power shifts. This makes sense, but goes against the whole issue of taking the lesser of the two evils, as it is argued that it is such a great harm for muslims to not take part and vote for the lesser of two evils and thus makes a matter that is generally agreed haram in origin to become permitted because of the need of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salams</p>
<p>It seems the title of this article &#8216;There isn&#8217;t a debate to be had&#8217; really has become the modus operendi..lol</p>
<p>Just a few issues for the brothers and sisters who are reading and practicing &#8216;There isn&#8217;t a debate to be had&#8217;&#8230; I think there is more to this issue than just the title.</p>
<p>For those who believe taking part in electing a legislature to rule by kufr is not only important but necessary to reduce the harm by choosing the lesser harm(which would be the common sense conclusion since you are saying the importance of the matter takes it from haram to halal/and required).<br />
Then why are we not told by these scholars and organisations who to vote for PUBLICLY? If it soo important and the great interest of the muslim&#8217;s in the UK, why is the message only &#8216;get involved and vote&#8217;, but not tell us who for?</p>
<p>If you want advise on an issue or a hukm, it is normal to get an answer from the scholars and those who lead the ummah, so why do we get a half answer here?</p>
<p>My analysis is, nobody wants to back a particular party as it may go against the interests of that scholar/group (or their projects/institutions) in the future, as in democracy power shifts. This makes sense, but goes against the whole issue of taking the lesser of the two evils, as it is argued that it is such a great harm for muslims to not take part and vote for the lesser of two evils and thus makes a matter that is generally agreed haram in origin to become permitted because of the need of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Niqabis (and non niqabis) have your say! by Freddie</title>
		<link>http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/2010/03/13/niqabis-and-non-niqabis-have-your-say/comment-page-1/#comment-3421</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/?p=1074#comment-3421</guid>
		<description>I am seventy years old,have served around the world in the Army including two years in South Yemen and Oman. Where ever I was posted I respected local customs. If you choose to live in my country don&#039;t try to force me to accept your customs. If you want me to respect your customs then respect mine and don&#039;t try to change my country to suit you. If it is the custom for muslim women to cover their faces in public okay,as long you understand it is our custom to expect the face to be uncovered.I would not converse with anyone whose face is hidden.

I read that Night Man claims in islam a woman is more precious than gold. That depends if you have the gold to provide a dowry when the girl child comes of age to marry.When I was in Aden I saw girl children with no eyes begging on street corners.I asked how could this be allowed, the answere was”It is the will of allah”. Because the parents could not afford the dowry for the girls they took out the girls eyes to get the sympathy of passersby to get more money. In my previous comment I stated I would not converse with a person whose face was covered,this does not mean I am mentally deranged I just want that person to show me they respect the customs of my country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am seventy years old,have served around the world in the Army including two years in South Yemen and Oman. Where ever I was posted I respected local customs. If you choose to live in my country don&#8217;t try to force me to accept your customs. If you want me to respect your customs then respect mine and don&#8217;t try to change my country to suit you. If it is the custom for muslim women to cover their faces in public okay,as long you understand it is our custom to expect the face to be uncovered.I would not converse with anyone whose face is hidden.</p>
<p>I read that Night Man claims in islam a woman is more precious than gold. That depends if you have the gold to provide a dowry when the girl child comes of age to marry.When I was in Aden I saw girl children with no eyes begging on street corners.I asked how could this be allowed, the answere was”It is the will of allah”. Because the parents could not afford the dowry for the girls they took out the girls eyes to get the sympathy of passersby to get more money. In my previous comment I stated I would not converse with a person whose face was covered,this does not mean I am mentally deranged I just want that person to show me they respect the customs of my country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There isn’t a debate to be had by Saif-ul Islam</title>
		<link>http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/2010/03/31/there-isn%e2%80%99t-a-debate-to-be-had/comment-page-1/#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>Saif-ul Islam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/?p=1118#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>Asalaam alaikum brothers,

Hope you all are well and in good health. Some talks explaining this issue in more details insha&#039;Allah, please kindly listen with an open heart and Allah (swt) knows best...

Maslaha - Introduction and Principles
http://www.archive.org/details/Maslaha-IntroductionAndPrinciples

Lesser of the two evils - Explanation and Application:
http://www.archive.org/details/LesserOfTheTwoEvils-ExplanationAndApplication

Ma&#039;asalaam
Your brother</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asalaam alaikum brothers,</p>
<p>Hope you all are well and in good health. Some talks explaining this issue in more details insha&#8217;Allah, please kindly listen with an open heart and Allah (swt) knows best&#8230;</p>
<p>Maslaha &#8211; Introduction and Principles<br />
<a href="http://www.archive.org/details/Maslaha-IntroductionAndPrinciples" rel="nofollow">http://www.archive.org/details/Maslaha-IntroductionAndPrinciples</a></p>
<p>Lesser of the two evils &#8211; Explanation and Application:<br />
<a href="http://www.archive.org/details/LesserOfTheTwoEvils-ExplanationAndApplication" rel="nofollow">http://www.archive.org/details/LesserOfTheTwoEvils-ExplanationAndApplication</a></p>
<p>Ma&#8217;asalaam<br />
Your brother</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There isn’t a debate to be had by Abu talha</title>
		<link>http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/2010/03/31/there-isn%e2%80%99t-a-debate-to-be-had/comment-page-1/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu talha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.islamicforumeurope.com/?p=1118#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>salam Bro azad

Sorry Boss. I did not realise i was mis-behaving.

salam

Abu talha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>salam Bro azad</p>
<p>Sorry Boss. I did not realise i was mis-behaving.</p>
<p>salam</p>
<p>Abu talha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
