Some thoughts on the news, religion and life in general
Contest 2: What does it mean for you?
On Tuesday the Guardian reported on a leaked draft government strategy document. Contest 2, the latest counter terrorist strategy proposes that people (read Muslims) should be considered extremists if:
• They advocate a caliphate, a pan-Islamic state encompassing many countries.
• They promote Shariah law.
• They believe in jihad, or armed resistance, anywhere in the world. This would include armed resistance by Palestinians against the Israeli military.
• They argue that Islam bans homosexuality and that it is a sin against Allah.
• They fail to condemn the killing of British soldiers in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Of course these plans have ‘won’ favour and support from Ed Hussein, Majid Nawaz and their foundation, from Harry Toube and Mad Mel. But what does Contest 2 mean for you?
For me, it means the key players in government still refuse to acknowledge that foreign policy plays a big part in drawing young Muslims towards extremism, this despite the government’s own security minister’s acknowledgement that claims there is no link between the threat of terrorist attacks in the UK and this country’s foreign policy was, and I am quoting so do excuse me, “clearly bollocks”. Essentially the government is not grown up, and responsible enough to admit its failures, to hold its hands up and admit that it has made mistakes.
It also lays bare the government’s plan to criminalise Muslims by criminalising civil and political dissent. The government promotes the values of democracy such as the freedom of speech and thought, but for Muslims under Contest 2 there is no freedom to think or believe - only compliance! Muslim thought and belief is to be dictated and policed, fall out of line and you will be ostracised.
In failing to acknowledge and appreciate the nuanced discussions and debates amongst learned scholars and leaders of the Islamic tradition on issues such as Khilafah and Shariah the government has chosen a particular (incorrect and incomplete) understanding of these concepts, imposed this understanding on all and sundry and decided to wage war against these based on their misunderstanding under the pretext of clashing with shared British values.
The government fails to appreciate that Muslims in the UK are already implementing Shariah in their personal and family lives; to not apply Shariah in our personal lives is to be non-Muslim! We’re even, dare I say it, implementing Shariah in our public lives though Shariah compliant banking and insurance! I’d like to see the government turn away Islamic Banking and the Millions it is adding to the UK economy. There is more to Shariah then the penal code (exactly what the definition of penal code is yet another discussion). Muslims believe any rule or legislation which brings about real benefit and wards of real harm is Shariah! Man, this refusing to promote Shariah is going to be hard!
Moving on to the Caliphate, again there is a complete failure to acknowledge that the source texts of Islam (The Quran and Sunnah) are in many cases silent about the details of governance and administration of a state or provide space for flexibility and Ijtihad. What is clear for all Muslims is that we do not believe in anarchy, that as human societies we need executive leadership and laws to govern our lives and that rulers are to be just and fair. As Muslims living in Britain our religion compels us to abide by the laws of the land, if we cannot do so we have no legitimacy to remain here. For Muslims living in Muslim majority countries, they too have a right to choose what system of governance they wish to live under, and if they choose Shariah, to create a federation of Muslims states, or a Union of Islamic Nations (not to dissimilar to the EU) who am I or you or anyone else to oppose them? A union of Muslim states governed by laws which bring about real benefit to people and ward off real harm is a good thing, is it not? If I was living in a Muslim majority country I would prefer that over the despots and tyrants currently in office!
According to the Guardian, those labelled extremist would not be targeted by the criminal law, but would be sidelined and denied public funds. And it is here where this latest attempt by the government will fail. For Muslims (whether community organisations or individuals) in Britain will not relinquish fundamental principles of their faith. Concepts such as Jihad, Khilafah, and Shariah are rooted in our tradition. That the open and unashamed practise and propagation of homosexuality is a sin is also an established Islamic fact.
Yes let’s have discussions about the how and why of all these issues, let’s discuss the foreign and cultural implantations some of these concepts and ideas might have. Let’s discuss to what extent these issues impact Muslim minorities living in non Muslim countries. But to describe as extreme anyone who holds these concepts to be a legitimate part of the Islamic tradition is not going to do anyone any favours.
One thing will become clear if Contest 2 becomes governmental policy: There will be no hiding space for Muslim sell-outs.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Abul Kalam on 19 February, 2009 at 4:54 pm, and is filed under Abul Kalam. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 1 year ago
Like you I believe that the government is mistaken if it tries to legislate in doctrinal matters and personal belief systems. If the governement persists and makes this a basis for engagement with the Muslim community, I fear it will undermine and detract from any serious and legitimate discussions that need to take place. For more on my thoughts feel free to read by blog:
http://www.ramblesofmrc.wordpress.com
about 1 year ago
Salam bro great article, I think this is just the start soon the goverment will say not just stopping funding is working so they will try and ban organisations or prosecute them for propagting Islam.
We must try and speak to the goverment at different level and tell them their stretagy is flawed and stupid.
about 1 year ago
As a non Muslim i have to that i was not aware of the nuances you mention in your piece. we are fed a very consistant impression of islam shariah etc. That it is Muslim belief that all things which bring about real benefit is part of shariah is news to me. I would like it if this idea could be expanded upon in a future blog.
Thanks
about 1 year ago
Do you think the govt will try and say that what we mean by all of the points is that it is in public you are not allowed to say it, as it is not ‘British values’, but what you think and do at home is up to you?
How do we answer that?
about 1 year ago
Daer brother or sister
I would agree with you that we are now going to see who the real Muslim sellouts are, however I am not sure of the stance you have taken in your article. your already being apologetic (for the want of a better word) it seems you are trying to justify the Islamic positions on Caliphate etc etc and asking the government to recognise the shades of grey without actually looking at the fact that this motion is contradictory to other own values of freedom and so forth, which is really hypocritical. The government and her stooges have failed to convince the Muslim community of some of the values they hold and now the push has come to a shove and this is the ponit we should hightlight.
about 1 year ago
Assalamu Alaikum Mohammad,
I hope I havent come out apologetic, that was not the intention, Infact i mention that despite government attempts otherwise Muslims will not “will not relinquish fundamental principles of their faith. Concepts such as Jihad, Khilafah, and Shariah are rooted in our tradition. That the open and unashamed practise and propagation of homosexuality is a sin is also an established Islamic fact.”
Also that the current postulations of the government is hypocrytical and falls fould of the ‘cherished’ value of freedom of thought and speech was alluded to when i wrote “The government promotes the values of democracy such as the freedom of speech and thought, but for Muslims under Contest 2 there is no freedom to think or believe – only compliance! Muslim thought and belief is to be dictated and policed, fall out of line and you will be ostracised.”
Kim,
Insha Allah one of my other fellow bloggers may wish to introduce the idea of Maqasid al Shariah or the grand objectives of the shariah to our readers, you are rigth, it will be an interesting discussion.
about 1 year ago
I think govt try to change the basic belife of our religion. It is very dangerous for a nation who belives tollerence and human rights. To me most of the points related to a extremist is the basic belief of islam. This kind of proposal will create more terrorrist in britain. It is time to raise our voice and heard the british policimaker that another serrious wrong is going to be done if this policy and proposal will continue.
about 1 year ago
Contest2 seems to be inherently flawed considering “promoting Shariah” is in itself something brown has done so by saying he supported Islamic banking!:
UK’s Brown backs Islamic finance (Tuesday, 13 June 2006)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5074068.stm
It really shows how ignorant these people are who are advising and are writing up such nonsense!
about 1 year ago
Excellent article – mashaa-Allah.
It’d be interesting to see how Whitehall plans to deal with NON-MUSLIMS (individuals and organisations) who believe that the Israeli aggression against the Palestinians was illegal – and that the Palestinians have the right to defend themselves?
What about the non-muslims who believe that the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were huge political blunders, leading to the unnecessary loss of life on both sides and were ulitmately not in the best interests of Britain?
Are these individuals/organisations also going to be classed as extremists or will the classification of ‘indigenous’ Brits as extremists or supporters of terrorism be a bit too difficult to swallow?
about 1 year ago
The question is- what on earth are “british values”??
“Values” are diverse and vary from people to people. Who defines what ought to be the values of a an entire population??? Since when did govenrments dictate for the people what values its population can have or not have???
If it is arued that the term “british values” is defined as the set of values that are held by the citizens of Britain– then us muslim’s values are also “british” values! for we are the citizens of this country. We make up the population. Therefor our values ARE IN FACT british values.
This country is a secular democracy. As such its values are not something fixed, rather it is diverse and subject to change.
The values that were held by the british public 100 years ago are not identical to the values they currently hold.
We need to show them the flaw in their argument of “british values”.
There is no such thing. We, the citizens, determine what OUR values are.
Never let them insinuate that “muslim/islamic values” are somehow in contradiction with “british values”.
Always ask them to define what they mean by “british values” and then argue the case that as british Muslims, our values should also be classified as “british values”, simply for the fact that we are british citizens.
about 1 year ago
Quilliamhas published a report on Mosques in the UK
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7907037.stm
Read the Full report on:
http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/images/stories/pdfs/mosques_made_in_britain_quilliam_02_2009.pdf
about 1 year ago
Following on from the valid points raised by ‘Captain’ on Britishness, there is some wisdom to be gained from the example of the Prophets in the Quran with their people.
The anbiyaa have shown us the greatest lesson in identity. In suratul A’raaf (versees 59-68), we see the Prophets Nuh and Hud (alaihimassalaam) calling their people “O My people, worship Allah…”, and at the same time, telling them that they wish the best for them “…And I wish well for you” and “I am for you a well-wisher (Naasih)” – so they agreed that their disbelieving people were their own and at the same time they wished well for their people. They didnt make their identification with their people a reason to simply live and do exactly the way their society did and wanted. In fact, these prophets, out of their well-wishing for their people, did the opposite and broke the norm of shirk and wrongdoings, and forbade these practice and were wholly against it, while calling them to Tawheed and all goodness. So as their loyalty was to the Islamic and universal values of justice (as shirk is the greatest oppression), and at the same time, they held that natural link with their land and people, so let their be no contradiction.
Thus, I believe that this ‘well-wishing’ is the ultimate baseline for one to be defined as ‘British’ (this criteria can be used with any land/people), or at least what today’s society expects. It isn’t necessarily full conformity and acceptance of British society and policies, as say parliament is full of British parties all with their own criticisms of Britain today. But what gathers them together, and why their criticisms are not considered ‘un-British’, is that their stances are understood to be in good intention, out of wishing well for their land (so Muslims speaking out on foreign policy should not be sidelinied as ‘un-British’). In social norms, I’m sure no one has yet said that Goths for example, or hippies/gypsies, beacuse they break social norms, are not British (so Muslims wearing Niqab should not be accused off such either). As Muslims, we also live differently like other minorities, and we might disagree with practices and policies as others do, AND like them, we wish well for them also. But How? It is exactly by our da’wah, by calling them to Allah, and our ‘enjoining the good and forbidding the evil’ -whether that be through opposition to gov policies or calling for removal of teaching about homosexuality to children – as ultimately, this is what is best for them. And if there is one thing being overlooked in our discourse, it’s this aspect. Currently, our actions are being seen as actions of hatred for Britain, from which you hear comments like “if you don’t like this country, you can leave”, and maybe (sadly) this might be true for some. If it is, then our stance should be clear: the British people are our people and we wish good for them, which is exactly the reason why we call them to Allah and disagree with some of their practices (NB: Wishing well should not be mistaken for walaa or loyalty – exaplained earlier -as their is a difference).
If after this they choose still to argue, then at least we have done our part in front of Allah, and it will be CRYSTAL clear to all then that they dislike us merely because we call to Allah and believe in Him, and it will be one step closer to our success.
about 1 year ago
The answer to all the problems is to let the ideoligy of HAMAS take control of the UK, then we wont need to worry about this issue or anything else
about 1 year ago
@Christian Orthadox
Taking control a nation wouldn’t really solve the problems. Living the life that is led by the Quran and Sunnah would be the best way.
about 1 year ago
I am a none Muslim, no matter what your particular faith is, we are all British citizens.
Some of the British values have their origin in Christian teachings, however many Christian teachings are the same or similar to the teachings of Islam.
I strongly believe that not enough is been done to bring communities closer together here in the UK, the fault lies on both sides, government could do more, church leaders and leaders of Mosques could do more, we need to dispell the lie as put about by some newspapers and extremist groups.
The protest in Luton on Tuesday by those opposed to British involvement in Iraq have done a great deal of damage, those images and the placards and quotes are spread accross the media, sadly those people are creating anti Muslim sentiment, they have given the BNP a boost, just what we do not want.
British Values mean that we always support our armed forces, if we think our armed forces should not be involved in a particular conflict or war BLAME THE POLITICIANS
British Muslims have as much right as anybody else to protest, they have a right to freedom of speech ( within reason ) – but Tuesdays protest was going “too far”
As a none Muslim I would appeal to good and decent Muslims whom I believe are the vast majority to distance themselves from Tuesdays protesters – those people are creating more votes for the evil British National Party.
about 1 year ago
Dear Dave,
I agree with a lot of what you have said, and I appreciate your open and fair minded viewpoint.
My only contention is with your claim of “British values”. As I have written in my post above, I do not believe in the concept of “British values”. There are NO SUCH THING.
You said, “British values mean that we always support our armed forces..”
I’m sorry but who dictated that??? How did you come to this conclusion???
If British values were as such, then why did those Britons (in this case the protestors) protest against the army??
Who are the “we” that you describe? Are they the British citizens? if yes, then, does not the protest by these British protestors show you that what you have claimed to be “British values” is in fact false?
Please read my post above and you will understand where I am coming from.
Also this notion of supporting our armed forces no matter what is a real disgrace. This was exactly the same mentality that was being pushed by the Nazi during the world wars.
the question is, though some may find it tough to digest, WHY SHOULD WE SHOW UNRESERVED SUPPORT to our armed forces?
Some may say, “Oh it is because they risked their lives for us”.
WELL I AM SORRY! They DID NOT risk their lives for ME. The war in Afganistan and Iraq was not to protect the British citizens. It was AMERICA’S wars that Briton got sucked in.
During the Vietnam war many soldiers refused to go fight as it was against their moral conscious. Now these were the TRULY BRAVE soldiers, as many had to endure prison sentences due to their decision. and that is what our armed personnel should have done. They should have refused to fight. That would indeed have been brave.
But to go to a war that the majority of the country did not want, a war which was illegal by international standards, a war that has lead to hundreds of thousands of innocents to die, a war that has created many many more extremists—- how can we be proud of any who partook in such a war?
I’m sorry, it just doesn’t wash down.
Having said that I do not condone/agree with the Luton protests, as i feel it was not the right way of doing it. At the same time I do believe that we should at times protest against armed forces if they are doing wrong, and the people who protest should not be seen as ‘anti-British’.
about 1 year ago
Captain says: ‘they did not risk their lives for me’
What’s next Cap? ‘I didn’t ASK to be born’? You’re an adolescent. You’re an individual, but you’re part of a society, a culture and a nation. You don’t get to make all the decisions – some of them are made for you. You don’t elect politicians to do what you say, you elect them to make decisions that will affect your life. Sometimes the politicians you didn’t vote for will get elected, sometimes those you did vote for change their policy.
Our armed forces are the sharp edge of our national identity, just as our police are the manifestation of the coercive power of government. Attack them, and you attack all of us.
It’s a bit like how pointing out that the prophet of Islam would be required to register on the Register (were he living in the UK today) is offensive to all Muslims.
Anyone who attacks our armed forces is our enemy, and must suffer the consequences.
Oh, and where do you get this ‘majority’ from, when you talk about support for the Iraq war? Would you like to see the results of a national poll on how to deal with militant Muslims? How far does your commitment to ‘democratic values’ go?
about 1 year ago
Melina, i understand what your saying regarding the armed forces being a part of the ‘british identity’. We can respect this in principle. however, to support them to a degree of making them immune to criticism is either utterly naively foolish or downright devlish. for example, the british soldiers involved in carrying out unheard of inhumane acts in Abu Ghuraib prison (pls note they did this under supervision of superiors, thus just following orders). Criticising them and condemning them, according to you is ‘attack(ing) all of us…’ i think thats absolutely ridiculous, as they were brought to court, therefore, suddenly now the lawyers, judge, police officers involved, media and average citizen is going against british values.
For me, there is no difference between these soldiers and the ones who have pressed a button, thus launching a bomb that kills innocent children in iraq, or the one who bombs a wedding in afghanistan, or the one who shots down someones brother, father, husband who is innocent. All of whom are ‘following orders’ and are oppressors. As a british citizen, my values oblige me to work to rid britain’s image of such illegal acts of aggression.
about 1 year ago
I can understand someof the argunments from both sides and I think both the Muslim leaders and the non-Muslim leaders need to work togeher to achieve mutual understanding and to build trusting relationships without which progress will be limited and counter productive.
I would also like to ask what has hapened to valuing diversity? …does anyone have the answer?
My last words are: ‘one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter’!
about 1 year ago
Melina,
Its clear form your childish rhetoric that you are someone who cannot think for yourself, let alone make any decisions. That is probably why you are happy to simply accept anything and everything that your government/army does without questioning.
Without a doubt you would have been a Nazi supporter, if not the General, had you been born in the era of Hitler. For they too showed blind support as you do, and they too considered all those who attacked their army as “enemies”.
I suggest you sport a fake 1 inch long moustache and have a good look at yourself in the mirror- for that’s probably who you would have been if you were born in Germany in those times.
The difference between you and all other sane people is that us sane people allow our morals to guide us on how we view governments/armies decisions, whereas you don’t. You do the opposite. You base your morals on what the government does/says.
Melina, you seem to use a lot of “us and them” rhetoric. Can you please explain who is the “our” when you say “…is OUR enemy”?
Who is “our”?
I am a Briton, am I included in the “our”?
How can the British people be the enemies of Briton for criticising Britain’s army??
Get this through your head— Us Muslims are also British! This is our home. We are not going anywhere. Most of us have been born here. Just because we are not happy with certain issues, and seek positive changes, it doesn’t mean we are now somehow non-British!
about 1 year ago
They argue that Islam bans homosexuality and that it is a sin against Allah….
As a CHRISTIAN I too believe homosexuality to be a sin…Guess that makes me an extremist too then.
about 1 year ago
Dear all, I’d just like to say, firstly that I am really impressed with the depth of thought, fair-mindedness and etiquette that you are all bringing to the discussion. It is refreshing to see such decent comments on these kinds of forums!
Secondly, this was a very good article – God bless you!
It is so important that we go beyond labels and speak with meaning, as the author has done. And this really brings out the purity of the core of our teachings, which as Muslims, we believe are at the heart of the message that all divinely inspired teachers of the past brought, not least our beloved Jesus (peace be upon him).
Kim, you were interested to hear about the purposes of the shari’ah, which could be translated as ‘the code for a godly life’. In response to your request, I thought I’d spend a few moments offering you my humble take on the subject:
For many centuries Muslim scholars have known that the underlying purpose of the Law was to confer benefit on people. This is not too surprising considering that it is a code sent by Man’s creator (and Woman’s of course!) , to help him and guide him. And if we assume that one of the Creator’s qualities is the ‘Ultimately Good’ (in Arabic ‘Al Birr’) then we know He wouldn’t make laws for us, just to be awkward, but rather for our own good! In this vein Jesus said, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27)
In the Koran, we are reminded, “It may be that you love something though it is bad for you and that you hate something though it is good for you.” That depth of knowledge about the nature of man, and what is ultimately better or worse for him, is best known by his Creator.
And so of course, anything that benefits people is endorsed by the shariah as well, e.g. a traffic system.
Society is nurtured and nourished by justice, just as it decays and rots when injustice becomes rampant. That is why some scholars argue that in many ways Britain is a better example of God’s law than most Muslim countries (not for one minute suggesting that things are perfect here, of course!)
One famous Islamic jurist from the 12th century (Ibn al Qayyim al Jawziyyah) explained: “When the signs of justice appear and its face is shown in any way, that is where the law of God and His religion are found.”
There is a well known scholar Al Ghazzali from the 13th century who was told by his teacher (Imam Al Juwayni) that there are key purposes behind the Law. He took it upon himself to discover these. After an exhaustive, painstaking study of every ruling in the religion, the scholar finally realised that the ultimate way in which the shari’ah benefits people is by preserving five core public interests:
Life, intellect, faith, family and property.
All the major, well-known rulings of the religion can be traced back to the purpose of serving one of the above five interests.
Finally, I’d like to remind my Muslim brethren of the Koran’s requirement of ‘jadilhum billati hiya ahsan’ – discuss with people in the best manner. Please, don’t insult anyone and before you press SEND, just think for a moment: how will your words affect the hearts of those whom you intend to address?
As Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) reminded us, We are all children of Adam and Adam was created from dust. Our words can be our egos. We do not need to laud our arguements over one another. We are simply asked by our Creator to win people’s hearts that they might be inspired to love Him and live in the pure and simple way that pleases Him, and through this, ultimately achieve inner peace.
Forgive me if I sounded a little harsh or bored anyone!
about 1 year ago
Dear Brothers and Sister,
This is a shame on the British Goverment. What are ‘British Values’? This country is multi-racial and all of it mixed together makes British Values. The Goverment is amking a serious mistake by doing this. This means that I will be called an Extremist just for holding core Islamic views. Calipahte is only the State ruled By Allah’s law. Shariah is every Muslims’ way of life. Jihad is mentioned in the Quran so many times. And failing to condemn the British and Americans who attack innocent people in my land. Believing that Palestinians cant defend themselves from Israeli TERRORISM and OCCUPATION. What is wrong with this Goverment. This plan will make more so-called terrorists! This country seems to be becoming a country based on BNP views and ideas.
about 1 year ago
Salaams All, thank goodness for someone like Rizwan, I have learned much from reading everyone’s submissions. But his summed everything up very well, which is why I notice no one else really had much else to say. I hope those who contributed have been able to see the other side’s perspective more clearly.
about 1 year ago
And of course thanks to Abul Kalam for writing this blog in the first place.